比 iPad Pro 大，比大多数平板电脑便宜--Teclast T70 平板电脑评测巨大的显示屏，小巧的价格。 Teclast T70 是一款平板电脑，售价不到 400 美元，配备 14 英寸大屏幕、蜂窝网络连接、GPS 定位服务和足够的电量，适合日常使用。由于尺寸较大，它是电影迷和数字报纸读者的理想设备。不过，你肯定得为价格做出一些妥协，不是吗？Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 06/04/2025 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
🇫🇷 🇪🇸 🇵🇹 🇮🇹 🇳🇱 🇸🇪 🇹🇷 🇵🇱 🇭🇺 🇷🇺 Android ARM Tablet Touchscreen
对 Teclast T70 的评价只有极少数平板电脑的屏幕尺寸超过 14 英寸，而 Teclast T70 的售价低于 400 美元，几乎没有任何竞争对手。当然，由于价格低廉，它的性能一般，偶尔还会出现系统卡顿现象。
不过，你也不能忽视 Teclast T70 存在的一些问题：它的触摸屏有时只有在多次点击后才会有反应，而试图以超过 1080p 的速度播放视频则会出现卡顿。
Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG
在软件更新方面也不要抱太大希望，而且平板电脑的 WLAN 网络连接速度也不是最快的。
它的运行时间适合日常使用，定位服务也足够精确，因此你可以把它当作导航设备使用。
您应该花点时间考虑一下，Teclast T70 的低廉价格是否值得拥有这些限制，或者您是否应该花几美元购买其他制造商的旧款产品。
尽管如此，如果你急于寻找一款拥有超大显示屏的最便宜平板电脑，那么你还是会得到一款可靠的设备。
Pros+ 稳定的金属外壳
+ 超大显示屏
+ LTE 和 GPS
+ 无 PWM 闪烁
+ 运行时间长几乎不发热
+ 几乎不发热
+ 经济实惠Cons- 几乎没有更新
- 无线局域网速度慢
- 蓝牙音频编解码器有限
- 繁重
- 大多不支持 4K 流媒体
价格和供应情况您可以从阿里巴巴等在线零售商处订购 Teclast T70，目前的价格为$318.82.
Table of Contents对 Teclast T70 的评价规格外壳 - 金属，印有天线连接性 - 配备 3.5 毫米音频插孔软件 - 更新希望渺茫通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 即使是 LTE 和 GPS电话功能和通话质量 - 清晰可闻照相机--模糊的事件附件和保修 - 含电源输入设备和操作 - 无指纹传感器显示屏 - 竞争更激烈性能 - 通常足以满足日常使用排放--无需担心高温电池寿命 - 无需充电即可观看三季节目Notebookcheck 总评分
4 Reviews ← exclude selected types ← exclude selected tags
规格
Teclast T70 (T Series)ProcessorMediatek Helio G99 8c/8t, 2 x 2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A76, 6 x 2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55, Cortex-A76 / A55Graphics adapterARM Mali-G57 MP2Memory8 GB Display14.00 inch 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 162 PPI, IPS, glossy: yes, 60 HzStorage256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 256 GB , 200 GB freeConnections1 USB 2.0, Card Reader: microSD, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: gyroscope, hall, gravity Networking802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (850/900/1800/1900), 3G (B1/B5/B8), 4G (B1/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B38/B40/B41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPSSizeheight x width x depth (in mm): 8.6 x 325 x 214Battery10000 mAh Lithium-Ion, 18 Watt chargingChargingfast charging / QuickchargeOperating SystemAndroid 14CameraPrimary Camera: 13 MPixSecondary Camera: 8 MPixAdditional featuresSpeakers: Quad speakers, charger, USB cable, 12 Months Warranty, fanlessWeight960 g
Price270 EuroNote: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.see all specifications
外壳 - 金属，印有天线Teclast 采用金属外壳，没有任何难看的塑料条，以确保更好的接收效果，而是将这些塑料条印在平板电脑的侧面。唯一的配色是蓝色。它的摄像头模块由玻璃衬托，可以同心折射光线。
平板电脑的外壳做工精良：几乎看不出材料的过渡和缝隙。
尽管体积庞大，但该设备非常稳定，只是在扭动时偶尔会发出轻微的吱吱声。不过，这款平板电脑重达 960 克，相对较重。它没有指定的防水或防尘功能。
Teclast T70
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
尺寸比较
Lenovo Tab Extreme Teclast T70 Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 Oppo Pad 4 Pro DIN A4 ❌
连接性 - 配备 3.5 毫米音频插孔即使 Teclast 平板电脑标榜拥有 20GB 内存：实际安装的内存只有 8 GB，其余的应该通过交换文件来解决，但我们认为这不是一个明智的解决方案，因为数据存储速度要慢得多。256 GB 的大容量存储空间属于同级水平，不提供其他存储变体。
Teclast T70 配备了蓝牙 5.2 和 3.5 毫米音频插孔。该平板电脑没有 NFC 芯片。
microSD 读卡器该设备的存储空间可以通过 microSD 卡进行扩展，在我们使用 Angelbird V60 参考卡进行测试时，读卡器的速度被证明相当快：它甚至可以赶上更昂贵平板电脑的读卡器。
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Lenovo Tab ExtremeMediaTek Dimensity 9000 (Angelbird V60)
48.6 MB/s +3%Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 UltraMediaTek Dimensity 9300+ (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
47.48 MB/s 0%Teclast T70Mediatek Helio G99 (Angelbird V60)
47.3 MB/s Average of class Tablet (10.2 - 79.2, n=42, last 2 years)
38.8 MB/s -18%
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
Teclast T70 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø38.1 (24.1-50.1) MB/sSamsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø34.5 (24.7-41) MB/sLenovo Tab Extreme Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø40.8 (27.3-49) MB/sTeclast T70 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø75.7 (17.8-83.5) MB/sSamsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø56.3 (30.7-71.6) MB/sLenovo Tab Extreme Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø70.6 (31.3-81) MB/s
软件 - 更新希望渺茫制造商已从 2023 年起为其平板电脑配备Android 14。你不应该期待太多的更新：在测试时，最新的安全补丁是从 2024 年 8 月开始的，因此已经过时。
好在 Teclast 没有安装任何第三方软件。
可持续性遗憾的是，在平板电脑的可持续发展方面，我们几乎没有任何正面的报道：平板电脑的包装仍然使用塑料薄膜，关于平板电脑二氧化碳排放量的信息和制造商使用的材料一样少。
通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 即使是 LTE 和 GPSTeclast T70 的通信功能包括 Wi-Fi 5、LTE 和卫星定位服务，对于这样一款价格低廉的平板电脑来说已经相当全面了。然而，在我们使用华硕 ROG Rapture AXE11000 作为参考路由器测量的 Wi-Fi 数据传输速率时，我们发现了第一道裂缝：在某些情况下，Teclast 平板电脑的数据传输速率仅略高于 100 MBit/s。这对于上网冲浪来说已经足够了，但由于偶尔会出现速度下降到 50 MBit/s 以上的情况，这在日常使用中会变得很明显。
您可以使用蜂窝网络访问互联网，甚至有两个 SIM 卡插槽可供使用。不过，它的频率支持有限，因此在国外旅行时访问 LTE 网络可能会受到限制。
另一方面，在我们的实际测试中，它的 GPS 定位精度相当不错：在我们的骑行之旅中，Teclast T70 与我们的实际路线仅有轻微偏差，有一次还明显显示我们正穿过一栋房子。尽管如此，如果您不要求绝对的准确性，那么这款平板电脑还是可以用于导航目的的。
Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 UltraWi-Fi 7
990 (496min - 1009max) MBit/s +968%Lenovo Tab ExtremeWi-Fi 6E
956 (876min - 983max) MBit/s +931%Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
946 (488min - 984max) MBit/s +920%Oppo Pad 4 Pro802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
878 (807min, 811.06P1 - 984max) MBit/s +847%Average of class Tablet (10.5 - 1801, n=65, last 2 years)
608 MBit/s +556%Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (10.5 - 718, n=240)
337 MBit/s +264%Teclast T70802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
92.7 (57min, 58.45P1 - 131max) MBit/s iperf3 receive AXE11000Oppo Pad 4 Pro802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
1723 (1322min, 1378.55P1 - 1804max) MBit/s +1336%Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 UltraWi-Fi 7
979 (909min - 991max) MBit/s +716%Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
957 (890min - 975max) MBit/s +698%Lenovo Tab ExtremeWi-Fi 6E
806 (614min - 856max) MBit/s +572%Average of class Tablet (40.2 - 1857, n=65, last 2 years)
726 MBit/s +505%Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (20.1 - 695, n=239)
330 MBit/s +175%Teclast T70802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
120 (100min, 100.29P1 - 144max) MBit/s iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHzSamsung Galaxy Tab S10 UltraWi-Fi 7
1888 (1860min - 1922max) MBit/s Lenovo Tab ExtremeWi-Fi 6E
1635 (1256min - 1717max) MBit/s Average of class Tablet (330 - 2357, n=29, last 2 years)
1303 MBit/s Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (287 - 330, n=2)
309 MBit/s iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHzSamsung Galaxy Tab S10 UltraWi-Fi 7
1842 (940min - 1895max) MBit/s Average of class Tablet (291 - 2349, n=29, last 2 years)
1500 MBit/s Lenovo Tab ExtremeWi-Fi 6E
1132 (682min - 1286max) MBit/s Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (291 - 339, n=2)
315 MBit/s
Teclast T70; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø92.7 (57-131) MBit/sTeclast T70; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø120 (100-144) MBit/s
Teclast T70 定位服务 - 概述
Teclast T70 定位服务 - 转折点
Teclast T70 定位服务 - 桥接器
Garmin Venu 2 定位服务 - 概述
Garmin Venu 2 定位服务 - 转折点
Garmin Venu 2 定位服务 - 桥接电话功能和通话质量 - 清晰可闻您可以使用 Teclast T70 打电话。
您可以通过两个麦克风和扬声器或耳机进行通话。使用内部音响系统的通话质量很好，我们在测试过程中能清楚地听懂对方的声音。在通话时，我们必须确保声音不要太小，否则电话另一端就听不到我们的声音。
照相机--模糊的事件使用前置摄像头拍摄的照片尤其是对于这样一款大型平板电脑来说，摄像头并不一定是用来拍照的，而是用来扫描二维码或阅读文件的。
其 1300 万像素主摄像头的照片质量充其量只能满足快照的要求：在亮度差异较大的情况下，它很快就会出现问题，在我们周围环境的照片上，即使不放大，也能看到其图像锐度的弱点。在光线较弱的情况下，色彩会失真，颗粒感很强，锐度和动态也有问题。
至少可以录制 2K 和 30 帧/秒的视频，但自动对焦速度相当慢。
前置摄像头分辨率为 800 万像素，很难满足自拍爱好者的需求。即便如此，对于没有高质量要求的视频会议来说，它也足够了。
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main camera plantMain camera surroundingsMain camera low-lightclick to load imagesTeclast T70Apple iPhone 16 ProOppo Find X8 ProCanon EOS 600D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesTeclast T70Apple iPhone 16 ProOppo Find X8 ProCanon EOS 600D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesTeclast T70Apple iPhone 16 ProOppo Find X8 ProCanon EOS 600D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1x
7.9 ∆E13.5 ∆E19.5 ∆E8.7 ∆E18.7 ∆E10.7 ∆E11.6 ∆E21.6 ∆E12.2 ∆E6.6 ∆E10.2 ∆E8.3 ∆E15.7 ∆E13.3 ∆E11.2 ∆E5.2 ∆E15.2 ∆E19 ∆E2.3 ∆E10.5 ∆E15.6 ∆E13.8 ∆E6.8 ∆E5.3 ∆EColorChecker Teclast T70: 11.82 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 21.61 ∆E30 ∆E55.5 ∆E40.2 ∆E35.3 ∆E46.1 ∆E62.8 ∆E54.2 ∆E36.5 ∆E44.6 ∆E29.4 ∆E65.5 ∆E64.5 ∆E31.9 ∆E48.1 ∆E38.2 ∆E77.1 ∆E45 ∆E42.5 ∆E94.8 ∆E71.7 ∆E52.9 ∆E37.5 ∆E24.4 ∆E13.9 ∆EColorChecker Teclast T70: 47.61 ∆E min: 13.91 - max: 94.84 ∆E
Teclast T70Teclast T70
附件和保修 - 含电源包装内有一个充电器、一条 USB 数据线和一个 SIM 卡针。
Teclast 平板电脑享有 12 个月的标准保修服务。
输入设备和操作 - 无指纹传感器Teclast T70 的屏幕最高运行频率为 60 Hz，因此响应速度不如其他产品。尽管如此，操作起来通常还是没问题的。但是，如果对平板电脑的功耗要求很高，输入有时就无法执行，例如，屏幕亮度控制就无法正常工作。
平板电脑没有指纹传感器，但可以通过面部识别解锁。不过，由于面部识别只能通过前置摄像头完成，没有配套的传感器，因此安全性不高，而且Android 也不允许用于某些应用，如解锁网上银行应用。
显示屏 - 竞争更激烈子像素阵列Teclast T70 的 IPS 屏幕分辨率略低于更昂贵的竞争对手，亮度也不高，在我们的测试中最高亮度为 402 cd/m²。它的亮度足以满足在室内工作或看电影的需要，但最好还是在室外寻找一些阴凉处。
在测试过程中，我们没有发现任何 PWM 闪烁现象。
402cd/m²396cd/m²382cd/m²388cd/m²400cd/m²370cd/m²383cd/m²375cd/m²369cd/m²
Distribution of brightnesstested with X-Rite i1Pro 3Maximum: 402 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 385 cd/m² Minimum: 18.3 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 92 %Center on Battery: 400 cd/m²Contrast: 1111:1 (Black: 0.36 cd/m²)ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 5.15 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.71}ΔE Greyscale Calman: 4 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.96}65.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)Gamma: 2.131CCT: 7235 K
Teclast T70IPS, 1920x1200, 14"Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 UltraAMOLED 2X, 2960x1848, 14.6"Oppo Pad 4 ProLTPS LCD, 3392x2400, 13.2"Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14IPS LCD, 2880x1800, 14"Lenovo Tab ExtremeOLED, 3000x1876, 14.5"Screen46%35%25%27%Brightness middle (cd/m²)400605 51%672 68%630 58%479 20%Brightness (cd/m²)385603 57%652 69%591 54%456 18%Brightness Distribution (%)9298 7%93 1%85 -8%90 -2%Black Level * (cd/m²)0.360.46 -28%0.82 -128%Contrast (:1)11111461 32%768 -31%Colorchecker dE 2000 *5.152.6 50%3.18 38%0.6 88%3.2 38%Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *10.415.4 48%4.84 54%1 90%6.82 34%Greyscale dE 2000 *41.6 60%2.2 45%1 75%1.8 55%Gamma2.131 103%2.08 106%2.396 92%2.2 100%2.28 96%CCT7235 90%6405 101%7070 92%6624 98%6794 96%* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)ℹTo dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.Screen flickering / PWM not detectedIn comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7744 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.
其色彩和灰度显示的准确度一般--肉眼可见轻微偏色。尤其是蓝色调明显失真。
卡尔曼灰度
CalMAN 色彩精度
CalMAN sRGB 色彩空间
CalMAN 饱和度
Display Response TimesℹDisplay response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times. ↔ Response Time Black to White23.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11.3 ms rise↘ 12.3 ms fallThe screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 54 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (19.8 ms). ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey38.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 20.7 ms rise↘ 18.1 ms fallThe screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 58 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (30.9 ms).
性能 - 通常足以满足日常使用Teclast 安装了 联发科 Helio G99是一款流行的中端 SoC。遗憾的是，它已经用了三年，与更昂贵的平板电脑相比，性能几乎没有优势。在日常使用中，偶尔会出现卡顿现象，尤其是在执行高强度任务时。
在 YouTube 上播放视频时，1080p 以上的视频质量会导致严重卡顿。这是一个遗憾，因为这意味着你很难使用平板电脑的大屏幕观看特别清晰的视频资料。
你只能期望在图形非常简单的游戏中以 60 Hz 的速度进行游戏，因为它的 GPU 性能通常最多只能达到 40fps。
在网上冲浪时，即使网络连接良好，您也不得不忍受大型网站页面加载缓慢的问题。
该设备配备了 UFS 2.1 闪存。这比价格较高的大型平板电脑要慢得多，但仍然足够在日常使用中快速传输数据。
Geekbench 6.7: Single-Core | Multi-Core PCMark for Android: Work 3.x Antutu v10: Total Score 3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | Steel Nomad Light Score GFXBench: on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen BaseMark OS II: Overall | System | Memory | Graphics | Web CrossMark: Overall UL Procyon AI Inference for Android: Overall Score NNAPI AI Benchmark: Score V6 Geekbench 6.7 / Single-Core
Oppo Pad 4 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3188 Points +346%Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 UltraImmortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2192 Points +207%Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1798 Points +151%Lenovo Tab ExtremeMali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1777 Points +149%Teclast T70Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
715 Points Geekbench 6.7 / Multi-Core
Oppo Pad 4 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
9218 Points +409%Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 UltraImmortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7327 Points +305%Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4690 Points +159%Lenovo Tab ExtremeMali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4513 Points +149%Teclast T70Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1811 Points PCMark for Android / Work 3.x
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 UltraImmortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
16743 Points +63%Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
16584 Points +62%Oppo Pad 4 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
14862 Points +45%Lenovo Tab ExtremeMali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13407 Points +31%Teclast T70Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
10265 Points Antutu v10 / Total Score
Oppo Pad 4 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2854581 Points +611%Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 UltraImmortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2033124 Points +407%Teclast T70Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
401253 Points 3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Oppo Pad 4 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6637 Points +1770%Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 UltraImmortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5527 Points +1457%Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2463 Points +594%Lenovo Tab ExtremeMali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2361 Points +565%Teclast T70Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
355 Points 3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Oppo Pad 4 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6683 Points +1799%Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 UltraImmortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5356 Points +1422%Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2488 Points +607%Lenovo Tab ExtremeMali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2345 Points +566%Teclast T70Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
352 Points 3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Oppo Pad 4 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
25482 Points +2004%Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 UltraImmortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
18628 Points +1438%Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9785 Points +708%Lenovo Tab ExtremeMali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8621 Points +612%Teclast T70Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1211 Points 3DMark / Wild Life Score
Lenovo Tab ExtremeMali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7834 Points +551%Teclast T70Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1203 Points 3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Oppo Pad 4 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2517 Points +1946%Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 UltraImmortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1920 Points +1461%Teclast T70Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
123 Points GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 UltraImmortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
65 fps +900%Oppo Pad 4 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
45 fps +592%Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
34 fps +423%Lenovo Tab ExtremeMali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
29 fps +346%Teclast T70Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6.5 fps GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Oppo Pad 4 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
98 fps +1533%Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 UltraImmortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
89 fps +1383%Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
45 fps +650%Lenovo Tab ExtremeMali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
41 fps +583%Teclast T70Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6 fps GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 UltraImmortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
93 fps +803%Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
51 fps +395%Oppo Pad 4 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
50 fps +385%Lenovo Tab ExtremeMali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
43 fps +317%Teclast T70Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
10.3 fps GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Oppo Pad 4 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
252 fps +1382%Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 UltraImmortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
209 fps +1129%Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
115 fps +576%Lenovo Tab ExtremeMali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
101 fps +494%Teclast T70Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Oppo Pad 4 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
44 fps +1592%Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 UltraImmortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
43 fps +1554%Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
21 fps +708%Lenovo Tab ExtremeMali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
19 fps +631%Teclast T70Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2.6 fps BaseMark OS II / Overall
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 UltraImmortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11721 Points +290%Oppo Pad 4 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
10865 Points +262%Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7589 Points +153%Lenovo Tab ExtremeMali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7255 Points +142%Teclast T70Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3002 Points BaseMark OS II / System
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 UltraImmortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
16435 Points +173%Oppo Pad 4 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
15124 Points +151%Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
12132 Points +101%Lenovo Tab ExtremeMali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9398 Points +56%Teclast T70Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6023 Points BaseMark OS II / Memory
Oppo Pad 4 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11132 Points +222%Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 UltraImmortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
10000 Points +189%Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8726 Points +152%Lenovo Tab ExtremeMali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7900 Points +128%Teclast T70Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3462 Points BaseMark OS II / Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 UltraImmortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
56004 Points +1831%Oppo Pad 4 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
42342 Points +1360%Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
19973 Points +588%Lenovo Tab ExtremeMali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
19574 Points +575%Teclast T70Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2901 Points BaseMark OS II / Web
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 UltraImmortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2051 Points +58%Oppo Pad 4 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2007 Points +54%Lenovo Tab ExtremeMali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1907 Points +47%Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1574 Points +21%Teclast T70Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1300 Points CrossMark / Overall
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 UltraImmortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1367 Points +135%Oppo Pad 4 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1172 Points +102%Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1098 Points +89%Lenovo Tab ExtremeMali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
948 Points +63%Teclast T70Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
581 Points UL Procyon AI Inference for Android / Overall Score NNAPI
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 UltraImmortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
74437 Points +899%Lenovo Tab ExtremeMali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
30392 Points +308%Oppo Pad 4 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
17934 Points +141%Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13748 Points +85%Teclast T70Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7451 Points AI Benchmark / Score V6
Oppo Pad 4 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12784 Points +18059%Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 UltraImmortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7341 Points +10328%Teclast T70Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
70.4 Points
Jetstream 2 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 Jetstream 2
2.0 TotalOppo Pad 4 Pro (Chrome 135)
200.378 Points Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra (Chrome 130)
183.971 Points Average of class Tablet (35.8 - 420, n=55, last 2 years)
168.6 Points Lenovo Tab Extreme (Chrome 115)
127.177 Points Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 (Mi Browser V14)
105.645 Points Average Mediatek Helio G99 (46.9 - 92.8, n=16)
75.8 Points 2.2 TotalAverage of class Tablet (61.3 - 579, n=41, last 2 years)
223 Points +152%Average Mediatek Helio G99 (88.6 - 95.3, n=2)
91.9 Points +4%Teclast T70 (Chrome 135)
88.6 Points WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra (Chrome 130)
193 Points +138%Oppo Pad 4 Pro (Chrome 135)
176 Points +117%Average of class Tablet (39 - 376, n=54, last 2 years)
150.6 Points +86%Lenovo Tab Extreme (Chrome 115)
100 Points +23%Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 (Mi Browser V14)
99 Points +22%Teclast T70 (Chrome 135)
81 Points Average Mediatek Helio G99 (39 - 89, n=13)
74.2 Points -8%Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra (Chrome 130)
71054 Points +213%Oppo Pad 4 Pro (Chrome 135)
57389 Points +153%Average of class Tablet (1633 - 138481, n=70, last 2 years)
50981 Points +125%Lenovo Tab Extreme (Chrome 115)
47420 Points +109%Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 (Mi Browser V14)
40762 Points +80%Teclast T70 (Chrome 135)
22689 Points Average Mediatek Helio G99 (17228 - 26476, n=24)
22118 Points -3%Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Teclast T70 (Chrome 135)
2156 ms * Average Mediatek Helio G99 (1600 - 2444, n=13)
1973 ms * +8%Average of class Tablet (243 - 16233, n=65, last 2 years)
1652 ms * +23%Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 (Mi Browser V14)
1121.3 ms * +48%Lenovo Tab Extreme (Chrome 115)
1103.4 ms * +49%Oppo Pad 4 Pro (Chrome 135)
666.6 ms * +69%Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra (Chrome 130)
632.4 ms * +71%* ... smaller is better
Teclast T70Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 UltraOppo Pad 4 ProXiaomi Pad 6 Max 14Lenovo Tab ExtremeAverage 256 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class TabletAndroBench 3-5270%251%157%126%25%119% Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)975.43912.45 301%3801.54 290%1983.47 103%1914.4 96%901 ?(482 - 1041, n=64) -8%2074 ?(126.9 - 4093, n=75, last 2 years) 113% Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)505.32963.58 486%3334.62 560%1873.45 271%1585 214%732 ?(369 - 998, n=64) 45%1666 ?(99.2 - 3773, n=75, last 2 years) 230% Random Read 4KB (MB/s)165.1342.97 108%297.28 80%374.54 127%330.7 100%225 ?(99.7 - 295, n=64) 36%276 ?(20.1 - 514, n=75, last 2 years) 67% Random Write 4KB (MB/s)195.5554.76 184%335.89 72%446.71 128%380.6 95%250 ?(99.2 - 390, n=64) 28%324 ?(9.1 - 989, n=75, last 2 years) 66%
排放--无需担心高温温度得益于其较大的表面积，该设备的 SoC 可以可靠地冷却--我们在测试中注意到最高温度为 35.1 °C。压力测试显示，其性能仅受到很小程度的限制。
Max. LoadIdle
28.3 °C30 °C29.2 °C 28.1 °C29.5 °C28.9 °C 28.5 °C29.7 °C29.4 °C
Maximum: 30 °CAverage: 29.1 °C
29.8 °C31.5 °C35.1 °C29.2 °C31.2 °C31.6 °C28.9 °C29.1 °C29.3 °C
Maximum: 35.1 °CAverage: 30.6 °C Power Supply (max.) 42.1 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260Max. LoadIdle
25 °C25.3 °C25.4 °C 25.1 °C25.2 °C25.3 °C 25.5 °C25.7 °C25.9 °C
Maximum: 25.9 °CAverage: 25.4 °C
25.4 °C26 °C26.2 °C25.4 °C25.5 °C25.7 °C25.4 °C25.5 °C25.7 °C
Maximum: 26.2 °CAverage: 25.6 °C Power Supply (max.) 29.3 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.1 °C / 84 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 30 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.1 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.4 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
3DMark Steel Nomad stress test
3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test StabilityTeclast T70Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.4 % Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99 % 0%Lenovo Tab ExtremeMali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98.9 % -1%Oppo Pad 4 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
82.9 % -17%Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 UltraImmortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
72.4 % -27% Wild Life Extreme Stress TestXiaomi Pad 6 Max 14Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.6 % 0%Lenovo Tab ExtremeMali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.5 % 0%Teclast T70Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.4 % Oppo Pad 4 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
83.3 % -16%Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 UltraImmortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
71.6 % -28% Steel Nomad Light Stress Test StabilityTeclast T70Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.3 % Oppo Pad 4 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
81.1 % -17%Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 UltraImmortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
80.7 % -18%
Teclast T70 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø2.04 (2.03-2.04) %Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø25.5 (23.3-32.6) %Oppo Pad 4 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø33.4 (32.9-39.5) %Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø14.7 (14.7-14.8) %Lenovo Tab Extreme Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø14.2 (14.2-14.3) %Teclast T70 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.26 (7.24-7.28) %Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø79.1 (73.6-101.7) %Oppo Pad 4 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø121.4 (119-143.7) %Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø56.1 (55.9-56.5) %Lenovo Tab Extreme Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø46.7 (46.6-47.1) %Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø98.7 (86.9-111.1) %Teclast T70 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø0.934 (0.927-0.943) %Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø12.5 (11.6-14.4) %Oppo Pad 4 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø17 (15.2-18.7) %
正面热图
热图返回发言人Teclast 平板电脑配备了四个扬声器，能产生不错的音效。它们能发出相当响亮的声音，甚至能重现一些低频。不过，音乐听起来有些遥远，不如高品质音响系统那样饱满。
遗憾的是，通过蓝牙输出的音频只能使用最基本的编解码器。
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)Teclast T70 audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.5 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.8% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(±) | higher mids - on average 8.1% higher than median(±) | linearity of mids is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.1% difference to median)Compared to same class» 76% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 19% worse» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 20%, worst was 129%Compared to all devices tested» 73% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 21% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Tab Extreme audio analysis(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.2 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.1% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(±) | higher mids - on average 5.8% higher than median(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (11.7% difference to median)Compared to same class» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 81% worse» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 20%, worst was 129%Compared to all devices tested» 8% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 89% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 134%
电池寿命 - 无需充电即可观看三季节目耗电量平板电脑的功耗很低，尤其是在高负载情况下。
它的最大充电功率为 18 瓦，这意味着最长需要 4 个小时才能充满电。
Power Consumption
Off / Standby 0.1 / 0.2 WattIdle 2.9 / 3.1 / 3.5 Watt
Load
6.4 / 10.4 Watt
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy
Teclast T7010000 mAhSamsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra11200 mAhOppo Pad 4 Pro12140 mAhXiaomi Pad 6 Max 1410000 mAhLenovo Tab Extreme12300 mAhAverage Mediatek Helio G99 Average of class Tablet Power Consumption-55%25%-99%-19%23%-22%Idle Minimum * (Watt)2.93.34 -15%1.5 48%2.57 11%2.6 10%1.565 ?(0.7 - 5.6, n=14) 46%2.21 ?(0.7 - 6.2, n=67, last 2 years) 24%Idle Average * (Watt)3.15 -61%1.8 42%8.65 -179%3 3%2.66 ?(1.1 - 7.48, n=14) 14%4.01 ?(1.2 - 9.06, n=67, last 2 years) -29%Idle Maximum * (Watt)3.55.11 -46%2.2 37%8.71 -149%3.4 3%2.93 ?(1.31 - 7.53, n=14) 16%4.4 ?(1.56 - 12.5, n=67, last 2 years) -26%Load Average * (Watt)6.412.77 -100%5.8 9%14.98 -134%9.5 -48%5.44 ?(2.9 - 10, n=13) 15%8.92 ?(3.5 - 34.9, n=58, last 2 years) -39%Load Maximum * (Watt)10.415.94 -53%11.4 -10%14.99 -44%16.9 -62%7.81 ?(4.8 - 11.2, n=13) 25%14.4 ?(6.8 - 60.3, n=59, last 2 years) -38%* ... smaller is better
Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
Teclast T70; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø8.16 (6.39-10.4) WattTeclast T70; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.97 (2.89-3.27) Watt
Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)
Teclast T70; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø8.13 (7.98-8.41) WattTeclast T70; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.97 (2.89-3.27) Watt
运行时间虽然与同类平板电脑相比，这款平板电脑的 10,000 毫安时电池容量并不算大，但仍能确保良好的续航时间：我们在 WLAN 测试中测得的续航时间为 15:43 小时，因此你可以轻松上网一整天而无需重新插上电源。你甚至可以用它的内置存储空间观看超过 17 个小时的电影，举例来说，这足以观看近 3 季的《霹雳游侠》。
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
15h 43min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
17h 03min
Teclast T7010000 mAhSamsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra11200 mAhOppo Pad 4 Pro12140 mAhXiaomi Pad 6 Max 1410000 mAhLenovo Tab Extreme12300 mAhBattery runtime-34%21%-4%-28%H.264 (h)17.112 -30%21.5 26%12.4 -27%WiFi v1.3 (h)15.79.8 -38%18 15%15 -4%11.1 -29%Reader / Idle (h)15.643.217.7Load (h)3.54.95.1
Notebookcheck 总评分Teclast T70 评测Teclast T70 是一款售价不高的超大平板电脑。
作为回报，您必须考虑到它在性能和软件更新方面的一些限制。
可能的替代品比较
Benchmark Comparison Plugin: ERROR, Layout "57" not supported!
Back to the verdict
Teclast T70
- 06/03/2025 v8
Florian Schmitt
Chassis78 / 98 → 79%
Keyboard73 / 80 → 91%
Pointing Device86%
Connectivity34 / 69 → 49%
Weight76 / 40-88 → 74%
Battery90%
Display72%
Games Performance6 / 65 → 8%
Application Performance54 / 92 → 58%
AI Performance20%
Temperature95%
Noise100%
Audio70 / 91 → 77%
Camera49 / 90 → 54%
Average50%
73%
Tablet - Weighted Average
CO2 EmissionsNo DataMaterials10%Packaging10%Power Use94.2%Repairability7%Software Updates5% Total Sustainability Score: 21%
More articles related to this deviceTeclast T70 (T Series)News•对 Teclast T60 Pro 的评价：高级功能，经济实惠 |Review•Teclast T60 Pro 测试 - 功能强大、价格低廉的廉价平板电脑 |News•与 iPad Pro 类似的超大显示屏这款 120Hz 平板电脑支持 4G LTE 和 GPS |Review•Teclast T65 平板电脑评测：120 Hz 的超大屏幕、铝制机身和蜂窝网络支持 |News•便宜货还是垃圾货？从亚马逊、Temu 等网站购买廉价平板电脑时应注意什么？ |News•硬件英雄还是金钱陷阱：对 Teclast T70 及其 14 英寸大显示屏的评价 |News•Teclast T60 AI 评测结论：配备 XXL 屏幕的经济型多媒体平板电脑 |Review•经济实惠的 12 英寸平板电脑，令人惊喜的附加功能 - Teclast T60 AI 评测 |Review•Teclast T60 Plus 评测：售价 130 美元的 12 英寸平板电脑，承诺过高 |Review•Teclast T65 Max 评测--价格低廉的 13 英寸平板电脑 |Review•Teclast T50HD 平板电脑评测--经济实惠的 11 英寸全能型平板电脑Android 14 |Review•Teclast T60 评测--配备超大电池的 12 英寸平板电脑 |Review•Teclast T45HD 评测--支持双 SIM 卡和超薄金属外壳的廉价平板电脑 |Review•Teclast T40 HD 平板电脑评测--配备大量快速存储和移动数据的经济型平板电脑 |Review•Teclast T40 Air 平板电脑评测--尽管价格不高，但运行时间非常出色 |Review•Teclast T50 Pro 平板电脑评测--移动通信和充足的存储空间，物美价廉 |Review•Teclast T50平板电脑评测--性价比爆棚 |Review•Teclast T40 Pro评测--带LTE的经济型平板电脑 |Review•Teclast T40 Plus。经济实惠的LTE平板电脑评测
TransparencyThe selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was freely purchased by the author at his/her own expense. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Add as a preferred source on Google
Editor of the original article: Daisy Dickson - Translator - 467 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2023Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 813826 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008contact me via: